“Abortion Premium Mandate”

Posted By on April 25, 2012

In recent weeks there have been reports about an abortion surcharge contained within President Obama’s signature healthcare law. Pro-abortion activists have been desperate to shove the issue under the carpet. They know full well public outrage will ensue if the law’s hidden agenda is fully exposed to the American people in broad daylight.

Many pro-abortion bloggers and members of the media have tried to hide the reality of the “abortion premium mandate”—a provision actually contained within Obamacare. But it’s imperative that you fully understand the facts they’re trying to hide.

Here’s how the provision essentially works: An individual enrolled in an insurance plan that covers abortions through an employer, by choice or even unknowingly, must pay an added abortion surcharge of one dollar per month. With no choice of opting out of the plan, paying for this abortion coverage is imposed whether an individual wants to or not.

This amounts to you and I being forced to take twelve dollars a year to the local Planned Parenthood or other abortion mill, place the money in the blood-stained hands of the abortionist and say, “This is to help fund the killing of innocent unborn babies.”

Obamacare even contains a clause that prevents insurance plans from letting people know about the required abortion surcharge. You won’t be notified that you’re paying into a plan that covers abortion until your time of enrollment. By then, in most cases, it’ll be too late. It’s sinister government secrecy—a bureaucratic sleight of hand—that will result in wholesale abortion-on-demand provided by the government.

Take a look at the text of the law for yourself:

(3) RULES RELATING TO NOTICE—(A) NOTICE—A qualified health plan that provides for coverage of [abortions other than in cases of rape, incest, or the life of the mother] . . . shall provide a notice to enrollees, only as part of the summary of benefits and coverage explanation, at the time of enrollment, of such coverage.

(B) RULES RELATING TO PAYMENTS—The notice described in subparagraph (A), any advertising used by the issuer with respect to the plan, any information provided by the Exchange, and any other information specified by the Secretary shall provide information only with respect to the total amount of the combined payments for [abortions other than in cases of rape, incest, or the life of the mother] (emphasis added).

Why would the law include such wording unless they didn’t want Americans to know what they’re buying until it’s too late?

In addition to a finalized HHS rule that requires coverage for abortifacient drugs, this is yet another wave of assault against the pro-life community and your religious freedoms by the pro-abortion Obama administration.

You can see why it’s vital that you help me spread awareness of and opposition to the abortion surcharge. The lives of countless unborn babies depend upon the Obama administration feeling the heat for trampling on the conscience rights of everyday Americans. Education is the key for pro-life legislative victories. Many of your fellow pro-lifers are vaguely aware that such an abortion surcharge exists, but they don’t have a solid resource that lays out a helpful explanation. Please share this email with them.

For LIFE, 

Bradley Mattes
Executive Director
Life Issues Institute

California Considers Allowing Non-Physicians to Perform Abortions

Posted By on April 25, 2012

April 13, 2012

On Monday, a California Senate committee will vote on a bill seeking to allow midwives, physician assistants and nurse practitioners to perform abortions — and life advocates say this weekend is the best window of opportunity to stifle the effort. 

 Read more

Legislative Alert

Posted By on April 12, 2012

Tell your Senators to co-sponsor the D.C. Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act  . . . Tell them to support this essential bill!

Senator Mike Lee (R-UT), a pro-life leader, recently introduced S.2103, the District of Columbia Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act in the U.S. Senate. This bill would protect unborn children capable of feeling pain at 20 weeks and beyond.

Nebraska, Kansas, Idaho, Oklahoma, and Alabama have already passed this bill, and part of the SBA List’s Pro-Life Presidential Leadership Pledge is to get this bill advanced and signed into law at the federal level. Rep. Trent Franks (R-AZ) introduced a version of this bill in the House of Representatives.

Take just a moment to contact your Senators and urge them to co-sponsor and support Sen. Mike Lee’s D.C. Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act. 

Alabama Officials Order Abortion Clinic Operators to Surrender License

Posted By on April 10, 2012

April 9, 2012

The Alabama Department of Health (ADPH) on Friday ordered the operators of a Birmingham abortion clinic to surrender their license by May 18. 

Read more

New Study Shows Abstinence Education Effective

Posted By on April 10, 2012

Research published this week revealed more evidence that a Sexual Risk Avoidance (SRA) abstinence program is effective in delaying sexual onset. Four major conclusions are drawn from the article, entitled, Impact of the Choosing the Best Program in Communities Committed to Abstinence Education.

Students in an SRA class were more likely to delay the onset of sexual activity from pre to posttest than their peers. The findings of this study are more realistic and relevant than the Jemmott study on abstinence, as well as most “comprehensive” sex ed. research since the study occurred in schools. 

http://www.lifenews.com/2012/03/30/new-study-shows-abstinence-education-effective/

Abortion-Ultrasound Law

Posted By on April 10, 2012

Oklahoma Judge Strikes Down Abortion-Ultrasound Law: An Oklahoma judge has struck down as unconstitutional a state law that would allow women a chance to see an ultrasound of their unborn child before an abortion. The law came under suit from a Tulsa-based abortion business.

The state legislature voted overwhelmingly to override Governor Brad Henry on two pro-life bills, including the ultrasound measure. Hours later, the Center for Reproductive Rights sued to stop enforcement of the pro-life law in Oklahoma County District Court.

Today, District Judge Brian Dixon claimed the law is unconstitutional and unenforceable because it relates only to abortion and not to other medical procedures.

The lawsuit was filed on behalf of Nova Health Systems, which operates an abortion center in Tulsa and has filed lawsuits against pro-life legislation over the years. Larry Burns, who does abortions in Norman, also is a party on the lawsuit.

 http://www.lifenews.com/2012/03/28/oklahoma-judges-strikes-down-abortion-ultrasound-law/